“Christian” Nationalism?

 Trump, the Heritage Foundation, and the Threat of a US Theocracy

It has become undeniable by now that Trump is likely going to become the candidate who, while not necessarily endorsing it himself, will represent the idea of “Christian Nationalism” in the 2024 General Election, at least as per the definition think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and others have forged. At first glance, this idea seems contradictory, given that Trump often represents the exact opposite of Christian ideals: He's an adulterer who has paid off an adult-movie starlet so that their affair did not become public; he's a pathological liar who has often enough sown hatred against the needy and his next ones; the man who couldn't quote any part of the Bible who has likely never looked into the Good Book. Apparently to such organisations, it's not about having someone to represent the ideals he's supposed to infuse into their policies, but someone they can manipulate for their own means. And ever since Michael Wolff's book “Fire & Fury”, it's known that everyone around him has used him as a puppet rather than a serious president with whom one could have discussions on policies from which to draw compromises that would finally convince both sides in Congress¹. The second tenure, if it were going to materialise, would be no different, only with more extreme manipulators in the White House and outside thereof.

Plastic, Paper and Perdition

 How Recycling becomes the Tip of Climate-Change Scales

Germany is often being reprimanded for its underperformance in recycling, despite its reputation as a pioneer and avantgarde[1]. Expectedly, outside of Germany, it doesn't look better, to a degree that pointing towards Germany's allegedly innovative separation of different wastes doesn't hold up to one's own underperformance: A recently published study[2] has shown that in the US, paper and cardboard worth millions of dollars are wasted due to improper recycling procedures. Now it was not the point to emphasise the waste of paper as all wastes that can be reprocessed are ought to. This accounts for wastes like plastic, which is known to infest the oceans and, in microscopically small shape, enters our bodies, from which it can even be “inherited”[3]. (Not to speak of the fact that very little plastic is actually being recycled, despite having just the right traits to be nearly infinitely being recycled[4]) But paper is a particularly crucial issue because of the raw material it is produced of, namely wood. Trees play an important role in our combat against climate change because of their essential ability to convert CO2 into oxygen. Many times when people became aware of Brazilian farmers' deforestation in the Amazon forest to create more arable land, the rainforest was described as the 'lung of the earth', a false equivalence[5] not only because algae in the oceans encapsulate disproportionately more CO2 than the rainforest[6]. (Algae can also contain hazardous materials like Bisphenol A[7]) But trees still play a major role, indisputably, which is also the reason why awareness has risen for the need to plant more trees altogether, globally, while reducing their felling for whichever purposes. We have already seen the consequences of losing entire forests while degrading their amount simultaneously because of vermin such as the bark beetle.[8][9]

My Christmas Message for 2023

 On Christmas, Politics & Society

Now the countdown has begun again: 14 days until Christmas. Many in our street have begun illuminating their house, decking the inside and outside with lavish decorations as if they needed to be visible from space, and of course the first christmas-themed sweets were already purchasable in late summer. All of this made me wonder again about how little the whole eve actually mattered amidst this ludicrous pomp. In Germany, we've got the famous skit movie entitled „Weihnachten bei Hoppenstedts”, where said pomp is being ridiculed, but as always, the best comedy is based on at least a grain of truth.

Individual Responsibility and Corporate Guilt

Recognising the import of the individual in a collectivised world

Foreword

In the early 20th century, many economic and political philosophers and thinkers began to see with aghast how collectivist philosophies and movements began to pave their way into power. The most prominent example was for sure the Большевики movement in Russia that would eventually bear the Soviet Union. Ayn Rand would thus be its most famous dissident who also contributed greatly to a political philosophy. (Even though many would perhaps disparage her or the Libertarian philosphy as a non-philosophy or apology for misanthropic instrument to smother the poor, and her as a spiteful bully mocking the same for their state of impoverishment; I have since offered a more sober and constructive critique of her thinking¹) Other dissidents, like Александр Солженицын or Жорес Медведев, instead decided to stay within their country and oppose against the Stalinist régime from the inside, undergoing several kinds of mistreatment, documenting the terror from the inside and exhibiting it for the rest of the world to see, even though knowledge about the reign of terror remains awfully low within post-Soviet Russia² as well as in the Western world. (For which I ironically didn't find any relatable articles; if you have got any, let me know through the known means of communication so that I will add them in a separate footnote)

Killing is his business — and business is good

 Russia — between international trade and international war crimes

Ever since Russia has initiated its war against Ukraine, presumed by a prior attack on the Eastern Ukrainian regions of Luhansk and Donetsk, two things have frequently, although not regularly, happened: Companies have departed from the Russian market because of either sanctions or ethical reasons. (To alternating levels), and leading talking heads have contemplated the question if, and if yes, when, 'The West' could return to the Russian market because Russia couldn't allegedly be cast out forever. One could wonder why that shouldn't be possible, given that not only has Russia become, if not always been, a pariah of Western principles and human rights, but also shows no sign of remorse, meaning that in consequence, it could start the same procedure again, against another country such as Estonia or Bulgaria, both of which have been alternately supportive of Ukraine. Russian talk shows have not been shy on waging unofficial wars against not only neighbours of Russia, but also Western countries who have pledged abundant military and financial support for Ukraine in its effort to defend itself and reconstruct destructed infrastructure.